Key Differences between Plaque and Calculus Left untreated, calculus poses challenges in effective teeth cleaning and contributes to tooth decay and other oral infections. Complications associated with dental calculus include halitosis, periodontitis (a severe form of gum disease), receding gums, and tooth decay. Over time, calculus accumulation worsens oral health and is often accompanied by halitosis (bad breath), which can cause embarrassment and social discomfort. Calculus forms when plaque attracts deposits of calcium and other minerals from saliva and food particles, resulting in solidification. Often referred to as tartar in dental terminology, calculus is a hardened form of dental plaque. Although small plaque buildups within a few hours may not raise immediate concern, neglecting to brush teeth after meals leads to rapid accumulation, harboring bacteria that contribute to tooth decay, gum disease, and other oral health issues. Dental complications associated with plaque include cavities, gingivitis (gum disease), abscessed teeth, and tooth loss. Initially colorless and inconspicuous, dental plaque can lead to tooth discoloration and a fuzzy sensation on the tooth surface when left untreated. The consumption of sugars, fats, acids, and starches found in food and beverages creates an ideal environment for plaque accumulation in the mouth. ![]() ![]() Plaque is a sticky film or coating that develops from remnants of food particles, housing bacteria. In this informative article, we delve into the dissimilarities between plaque and calculus, shedding light on their formation processes, effects on oral health, and effective techniques to maintain a radiant smile by combating plaque and calculus. However, fear not! Taking control of these dental concerns begins with comprehending their root causes, treatment methods, and prevention strategies. This field requires further research, as no product has been developed that prevents calculus formation completely.Plaque and calculus are prevalent dental issues that can compromise our smiles and impact our social interactions. The results did not demonstrate the anticalculus efficacy of the pyrophosphate-based mouth rinse or positive effects on saliva flow or composition. Calcium tended to increase after using the test-B mouth rinse. The test/B and placebo mouth rinses both modified certain parameters in saliva composition, particularly reductions in urea, uric acid, and phosphorous. Patients perceived that the test mouth rinse was more effective. No changes to the mucosa or teeth were observed. Calculus volume decreased with both mouth rinses. ![]() V-M index and calculus weight decreased after using the test mouth rinse. ![]() The test mouth rinse B produced reductions in urea, uric acid, and phosphorous, calcium, saliva flow, and increases in pH. A range of parameters were measured for: saliva (saliva flow, pH and chemical composition) calculus (Volpe-Manhold index, weight, and volume) adverse effects on mucosa and teeth and the patients' subjective perceptive of mouth rinse efficacy. Patients used a pyrophosphate-based test mouth rinse (B) or a placebo (A). This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial included 40 patients with treated and managed periodontal disease, all with a history of rapid calculus formation. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of an anti-calculus mouth rinse and its possible adverse effects on the mucosa and teeth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |